| dc.description.abstract | The rule of law and access to justice are essential to the growth and stability of a
state. Because alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a tried-and-true method of
ensuring that everyone can access justice in a civilized manner without resorting
to adversarial hearings in formal litigation, ADR programs are becoming more
and more significant in almost every jurisdiction. Bangladesh is a prominent
participant in these commendable initiatives. The societal perception and
functioning of courts have been impacted by the movements for access to justice
and alternative dispute resolution. Both movements have criticized the courts for
their failure to provide accurate, significant, and accessible justice for the
populace. ADR has also been highlighted as a tool for better dispute resolution
procedures that lead to better results. In order to fully realize the potential of
alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a tool for granting access to justice, this
paper seeks to identify the necessity of ADR and various forms of dispute
resolution mechanisms, as well as the necessity of dispute resolution system
design. This is an attempt to present a thorough understanding of the methods by
which our legal system allows people to access justice. It does this by examining
the theory and practice of access to justice, as well as the court and non-court
based applications of those modalities under various laws in Bangladesh. This
demonstrates the efficacy, efficiency, and fairness of alternative dispute resolution
(ADR) in advancing access to justice. Lastly, it talks about how Bangladesh has
implemented reforms in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), which are a well
liked aspect of justice access. | en_US |
