The Effectiveness of International Law in Resolving Protracted Conflicts: Lessons from the Israel- Palestine Case

Abstract

This research examines the effectiveness of international law in resolving protracted conflicts, with a particular focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict. The study explores the role of international legal instruments, such as United Nations resolutions, the Geneva Conventions, and the International Court of Justice's rulings, in addressing the longstanding disputes between Israel and Palestine. It highlights how international law has been employed to frame the legal parameters of the conflict, yet faces significant challenges in enforcement and application due to political power dynamics, particularly the influence of key states like the United States. Through case studies such as the Oslo Accords, UN Security Council Resolutions, and the ICJ advisory opinion on the West Bank barrier, the research demonstrates both the potential and the limitations of international law in conflict resolution. The findings indicate that while international law provides important frameworks for peace, the resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict is hindered by political realities, lack of accountability, and the absence of strong enforcement mechanisms. The research concludes that a comprehensive resolution will require not only legal frameworks but also sustained diplomatic efforts, international cooperation, and political will from all parties involved. The study also compares the Israel-Palestine conflict with other protracted conflicts, offering valuable lessons for future peace-building efforts.