Evaluating the Impact of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) on Reducing Case Backlogs in Bangladesh: A critical Analysis

Abstract

In Bangladesh, the traditional court system has struggled with an overwhelming backlog of cases, leading to delayed justice and a strained judiciary. This thesis critically examines the impact of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms in alleviating these backlogs, with a focus on Bangladesh’s legal and socio-cultural landscape. ADR, which includes arbitration, mediation, and conciliation, has been proposed as an efficient means to expedite dispute resolution. This research explores the effectiveness of ADR in reducing caseloads, assesses its accessibility and acceptability among the public, and examines any systemic barriers to its broader adoption. Through both quantitative analysis of case resolution data and qualitative interviews with stakeholders—judges, lawyers, and ADR practitioners—this study evaluates the extent to which ADR has contributed to reducing case backlogs and identifies areas for improvement. By offering insights into the operational strengths and limitations of ADR, this thesis aims to provide policy recommendations for strengthening ADR frameworks in Bangladesh and enhancing public trust in alternative justice mechanisms.