| dc.description.abstract | Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has emerged as a significant mechanism for advancing
constitutional rights, ensuring governmental accountability, and promoting social justice
in Bangladesh. Through PIL, courts have addressed issues ranging from environmental
protection and human rights to administrative transparency and the protection of
marginalized communities. However, the expanding role of the judiciary in public affairs
has also generated debate regarding the boundaries of judicial intervention. Critics argue
that excessive reliance on PIL may encourage judicial activism and lead to judicial
populism, where courts venture into policy-making domains traditionally reserved for
elected institutions. This thesis examines the development, legal foundations, and impact
of PIL in Bangladesh, assessing whether it primarily serves as a tool for justice or
contributes to judicial overreach. By analyzing landmark cases, constitutional provisions,
and scholarly perspectives, the study evaluates the effectiveness of PIL in strengthening
the rule of law while considering concerns about democratic accountability and
separation of powers. The research concludes that while PIL remains an essential
instrument for protecting public interests and fundamental rights, its legitimacy depends
on maintaining a careful balance between judicial intervention and institutional restraint | en_US |
