| dc.description.abstract | It requires no reference all over the world to claim that where there is a duty, there is a
right. But sometimes, exceptions are found unexpectedly. Though the concept of
Intellectual Property Law is not very ancient in nature, but it covers a great part of
rights of meritorious people over intangible assets. It has been observed by the
researchers that some sorts of IP are yet overlooked by the lawmakers while making a
focused area of IP. It has been found through analysis that the question of recognition
of reflection of personal thoughts of a university teacher in a classroom is not irrelevant
in Bangladesh perspective. And a mentionable number ofunexpected events have been
experienced like copying and publishing papers which could easily be called plagiarism
if were done from a written research. The level of interference is so frustrating that
some teachers even have been victimized physically and socially. Such humiliating
harassment is expanded even up to police arrest. It has been found inconsistent that
there are available examples ofnon-recognition ofpersonal thought as IP, but abusing
interpretations are available as to sufferings. This seems a threat to education system of
Bangladesh as professional immunity is hampered in a mentionable manner in this
process which is easily exercisable in other professions. This research bonafidely
attempts to unveil some hidden issues and recommend a relevant solution. | en_US |
